Amp Inhibiter

[Hidden]

I think that i found something interesting about the amp restricting process.


1° Is very clear from meyer drawings that the chokes were non inductive. (FIG. 3-23) Vic (pulsing core configuration) and other FIG's


2° They were made of resistive wire.


3° They were wound in a inductance core.


4° Bifilar


Now i'll try to go into all this and explain to you what i'm thinking about.


A non inductive construction implies that there will be two wires wound with the same length in counter directions and therefore there will be a repelling force between the wires because the current is flowing in oppose direction.


Bifilar would be just the perfect embodiment to maximize this force cause you reduce the distance between the two wires even if is not actually totally necessary as we can see in his drawings.


If you have resistive wire winded as bifilar you will have a greater voltage drop between the two leads of the wire therefore another force get into the equation, the electrostatic attraction. The positive side will be close to the negative, so while the magnetic field repulsion restrict the current the electric field create an attraction force witch hold the electrons to a certain degree.


Also being the wire ferritic, the magnetic field force of the wire is much greater than copper, and its resistive characteristics also aid the restriction of the amp flow. 

[Hidden]

Also, being bifilar implies in existing a capacitance in parallel with the water cell.




I may have confused you.


So here again more explained.


The chokes (resonant charging chokes) could be two chokes non inductive each one connected to one side of the cell, being part of the same transformer as from the (fig 3-23) as to form a charging pump while also restrict the amps.  (i'm not sure if it can do both things at the same time but in the case it not probably is better to have it as a charge pump and than add the amp inhibiter coil as describe under)


and or


one single choke (amp inhibiter coil) being bifilar (two wires twisted together) wind over a core and having one of the extremities connected to each other. So kind of a common mode choke. (non inductive)


I mean bifilar because the two wires are wind in the same direction one perfectly side by side with the other. But than on the end of the coil the two wires are connected together to form a non inductive coil. 

[Hidden]

another possibility would be


a coil wound on a magnet, arranged such way to repel the magnetic field, thus restrict the current. 

[Hidden]

Geting into the Pulsing core configuration, what i can see is that the resonant charging choke 56 B+ forms with the secondary the charge pump that i aways describe, cause if you pay much attention secondary coil and RCC 56 are fields aiding.


Therefore the other resonant charging choke 62 B- is restricting the amps (magnetic repelling action) in relation to the secondary coil, cause is configured as field canceling with the secondary.


I believe that the thing is to find the right relation of charge pump action and restriction action.

[Hidden]

Hi Seb,
In response to your posts,
A coil of wire is inductive. It doesn't have a choice. As soon as the magnetic field starts to form the induction starts. (notice i said as the field starts to form)


Now if the 2 inductors were wound in a bifilar pattern together and connected to produce opposing magnetic fields you would have a net of 0 inductance, net meaning overall, but you still have circuit inductance. If they were set up to bolster each other i believe that you have 2x inductance minus 1/3 resistance, note that you need resistance to increase the magnetic field strength.


Electromagnets increase power with amp movement. if your circuit removed the amps then the inductance would be 0 regardless of how it was wound.


Something you should know about the term restrict, this term is also used with inductors in transmission and RF engineering. Basically what it says is the inductor acts like an ampere smoother. As more amps are passed through the inductor it creates a stronger magnetic field. As the magnetic field is created, it in turn increases the resistance, in turn increasing amp pull. This also works in reverse, once the field is set up if the amp supply drops some of the field collapses maintaining the amp flow out for a period of time equal to stored energy.


If you wound an inductor on a set magnetic core, what would happen is you have the effect of canceling/bolstering the magnetic field in the inductor to a point where the amp flow ceases and then as the field collapses it forces the charge to return to the previous state of magnetic orientation.
On this, there are High frequency devices that actually use strong reverse bias inductors as short burst diodes. As there is no required forward voltage in order to allow the flow of electrons.