Author Topic: Resonance WFC  (Read 8131 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Hidden

  • Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 112
Re: Resonance WFC
« Reply #100 on: August 17, 2011, 07:16:10 am »
Looks good!,
Just some questions,
If you are using resonance i am assuming you will be resonating for voltage...


Whats your operational voltage expected? also have you calculated in kickback from your cycles? Would hate to see all that work fried because you had more than your calculated voltage come back through the transformer...

Offline Hidden

  • Moderator
  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 330
Re: Resonance WFC
« Reply #101 on: August 19, 2011, 14:02:26 pm »
hey webmug, right on, this is where stans famous statement, restrict the amps and allow voltage to take over, comes into play, with amps flowing through the water the voltage can not grab onto the water and oscillate it, first amps must be completely cut off, then, and only then, with even 7 volts or around there, really low, as he mentioned in the 661 patent, the water can be set to oscillate between the plates, and be broken apart. Higher voltage just means the "amplitude" of the oscialltions is increased, more force.
John Keely's Laws of Harmony (1898)-> 40 powerful laws:
John Ernst Worrell Keely direct relation to Stanley Allen Meyer and Dr. Andrija Puharich etc.

Law of Chemical Dissociation
"If the pitch of either atom, in a molecule, be raised or lowered; or, if they both be unequally raised or lowered in pitch until the mutual ratio be that of a discord; or, if the oscillation amplitude be augmented by heat until the atoms are with the concentric waves of attraction, - the atoms will separate."

Law of Variation of Atomic Pitch by Electricity and Magnetism
"Electricity and Magnetism produce internal vibrations in the atom, which are followed by proportional changes in volume and, therefore, pitch."

Br,
Webmug

Offline Hidden

  • Moderator
  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 330
Re: Resonance WFC
« Reply #102 on: December 06, 2011, 15:02:19 pm »
Hi,

I see a all types of VIC cores, but never a list of used material. So please post your core material what you are using.
Personally I think the Initial permeability (μi) should be high. I never tested high μi. Look for Mn-Zn.

Soft ferrites
Ferrites that are used in transformer or electromagnetic cores contain nickel, zinc, and/or manganese compounds. They have a low coercivity and are called soft ferrites. The low coercivity means the material's magnetization can easily reverse direction without dissipating much energy (hysteresis losses), while the material's high resistivity prevents eddy currents in the core, another source of energy loss. Because of their comparatively low losses at high frequencies, they are extensively used in the cores of RF transformers and inductors in applications such as switched-mode power supplies (SMPS).

The most common soft ferrites are manganese-zinc (MnZn, with the formula MnaZn(1-a)Fe2O4) and nickel-zinc (NiZn, with the formula NiaZn(1-a)Fe2O4). NiZn ferrites exhibit higher resistivity than MnZn, and are therefore more suitable for frequencies above 1 MHz. MnZn have in comparison higher permeability and saturation induction.

http://www.bnf.com.hk/new_page_1.htm
http://www.bnf.com.hk/new_page_3.htm

Ferrite - Manganese Zinc (Mn-Zn)

My VIC core materials:
----------------------
Iron
----------------------
Plates (silicon alloy steel lamination)
----------------------
Ferrite - Nickel Zinc (Ni-Zn)
Material //    μi   // Bms(Gs) // Hc(Oe) // Br(Gs) // Tc(℃) // ρ(Ω-cm) // Frequency(MHz) // αur x 10-6/oC
A2G      // 300 // 2800      // 0.52     // 1500   // 160     // 1*107    // 0.1~3  // 20~45
----------------------
400HH material 67 u=40 (Initial Permeability 40) B=2300 H=20 Br=800
----------------------

Br,
Webmug

« Last Edit: December 07, 2011, 11:28:10 am by webmug »

Offline Hidden

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Join Date: Nov 2011
  • Posts: 4
Re: Resonance WFC
« Reply #103 on: January 07, 2012, 19:08:05 pm »
I totally agree. Please post magnetic parameters of cores used (AI appreciated).

There is no chance to compare wind counts without those magnetic parameters.

pragma

Offline Hidden

  • Moderator
  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 330
Re: Resonance WFC
« Reply #104 on: February 07, 2012, 21:42:26 pm »
Looking into the "Resonant Action" process gives me the conclusion we are missing a part of the electronic circuit where SM could adjust the voltage amplitude.

If you look at the attachment we see Fig.16 voltage (Va) "Low gas-yield" voltage amplitude above (0V) and is variable to (Vn) "High gas-yield".

"Simply moving liberated atoms back and forth uniformly through the electrical polarization process in a repetitive manner establishes Resonant Action within the Fuel Cell".

This is only when there is a (maintaining electrostatic field) voltage (PULSE to restrict current) to maintain the polarization process.

If we simply adjust the voltage amplitude to the Transistor it gives Fig.9A (PULSE)
Fig.9B is the (GATE) for Resonant Action and should be multiplexed on Fig.9A (PULSE) to finally get Fig.16.

We now use the (official) circuit replicated from the photos from (Dynodon). This signal coming from this circuit is not the Fig.16 signal!
We all use (PULSE) Fig.91 and this is gated to 0V!

The transistor should have an voltage offset signal,

All you electronics tech guys, please reply...

Br,
Webmug