Multipactor effect and "Resonant Cavity"

[Hidden]

Just a note on changing the polarity. Does anyone else recall what Stan designed for the ...water holding tank for the car application? It was a circuit that changed polarity constantly at a very fast rate. This would Oscillate the water molecules causing friction in turn heating the water keeping it from freezing. Theoretically it could even super heat the water instantaneously if designed correctly. I know that this doesent really apply to what you are talking about here but it does show that "VIC" idea was applied to almost everything and everything would require a different configuration. I think it would benefit people to get a final goal in mind. Something like running a car or getting a torch so stay light solely on a WFC. Then you will have something to design toward. Otherwise you are just trying to make a random VIC or a random resonant cavity with an infinite amount of variables. Make a bullseye and shoot for it. So you want an electron extraction circuit to power a lightbulb OK great! but what are you extracting electrons from? Water? Ambient Air? are you going to use laser injection? are you going to try something more basic without lasers? This isn't really aimed at anyone particular its just the questions i ask myself. Any way I have made a stepping stone goal system for myself and I'm working on it as we speak. Stone 1: Rotary Pulse Voltage Frequency Generator-------Check
I found that it will not produce enough fast enough to sustain even the smallest flame. Thats the problem with a Proof of Concept, it only proves a concept!
Stone 2: Ill let you know when I'm standing on it! 
I guess all im saying is that it seems like people are doing alot of trying to figure out one small component of a very large system. To me it seems like we need the whole sywstem in place and then mess with the variables like the # of winds on the VIC or what type of wire its made out of or what configuration works the best. In other words built the entire electron extraction circuit conplete with a resonant cavity and then if it doesent work right change something.

[Hidden]

@Bluesky
I know you said you aren't focusing your comment at anyone in particular....but, as it's my thread I feel I must address your comment

I agree we need stepping stones...but, I am concerned with the ultimate goal of what we are trying to achieve, otherwise, we are building in the dark!
We must understand (or at least grasp the concept of) the physical concepts we are aiming for.
I definitely have a goal...yet my steps are incremental, and methodical. See, I have many resources and have built many things. They are however, small proofs of concepts and investigative tools...I haven't put all my collected materials together in some ultimate machine because I cannot afford such a pricey failure.

"Slow and steady wins the race"

[Hidden]

For sure! And I really didnt aim my comment at anyone in fact i wasnt even paying attention to who started this thread!

[Hidden]

Update , this guy was pretty smart . I am 99% sure this is related to the waveguide matching talked about in the Stephen patent .

On skype he really impressed me with his chemistry knowledge and I have a gift @  knowing whos smart , this guy was smart , the guy read alot of books .

Quote:

As understood in resonant cavities of an electron nature...

What is a resonant cavity of an electron nature ? What is the nature of a resonant cavity usually ?

Tutanka you know this guy right ? In fact I found your theory ( vague as it may be ) to be quite similar to what Radiant thinks .

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multipactor_effect

I find this rather amazing ,

Quote: "An undistorted output of 25 watts was obtained from an input of 25 watts" ...

http://journal.borderlands.com/1988/the-farnsworth-multipactor-tube/