Author Topic: Pulsed signal 60% more effective then strait DC  (Read 1952 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online Hidden

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 2496
    • water structure and science
Re: Pulsed signal 60% more effective then strait DC.....conclusion
« Reply #45 on: October 25, 2009, 14:49:40 pm »
Conclusions:

Output FET:  43.8Vrms by 4.22A = 184W
Input WFC:  36,5V by 8.08A = 294W
Output AC Variac: 79Vac by 4.9A =  387W (different set of meters as the other 2 measurements points.)
Gasoutput: ca. 2 minutes for 0.5 ltr
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Strait DC into wfc:  37.4V by 7.62A = 285W
Output AC Variac: 41V by 9A = 371W
Gasoutput: ca 2 minutes for 0.5 ltr
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conclusions:
1.   My meters on the AC side where not identical as the other 4 meters, so a   
                mismatch is very possible between AC power and DC power.
2.   My circuit is a perfect converter for squarewave to strait DC.
3.   No OU or any gains what so ever compared to totall input vs output. (from trafo till
                wfc)
4.   Strait DC still wins against any kind of pulsing circuits.


As you can see, lots of time is again consumed with no results, except the gain of knowledge...... ;) ;) ;)

bammer.......

Steve



Offline Hidden

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 23
Re: Pulsed signal 60% more effective then strait DC
« Reply #46 on: October 26, 2009, 00:29:53 am »

As you can see, lots of time is again consumed with no results, except the gain of knowledge...... ;) ;) ;)

Ah, Steve, there are indeed results.    Knowledge.   

And the pursuit of knowledge necessarily takes time.  Thanks for doing this

Turtle