Author Topic: Results from some tests...  (Read 4465 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Hidden

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 78
Re: Results from some tests...
« Reply #5 on: July 01, 2009, 01:59:33 am »
dude thats awesome .

Hurray . :D

Im so motivated right now , thx .

Im continuing with this project I'm making , stephen meyers  dual synchronised 3 phase analog driver @ 24 volts .

I believe you Gauss , I think 2curious saw that too .

http://www.ionizationx.com/index.php/topic,683.msg6683.html#msg6683

But everybody should keep working on the tesla hairpin too , we need to divide efforts .

Electricity and transport .

Offline Hidden

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 1002
Re: Results from some tests...
« Reply #6 on: July 01, 2009, 03:26:59 am »
we pushed 6 pcs of some vibrational dampening material like soft rubber between the cylinders(3 in the top and 3 in the bottom)

vibrational dampening material? would you rather suspect that an arrangement with minimum dampening characteristics would have better results?

With a tuning fork, it is fixed at one end, when you vibrate it and touch rubber it will dampen out quickly, when you touch metal it will continue to ring. (and when you dip it in water it splashes like crazy!) I suggest a metal structure to hold the tubes secure yet still able to vibrate. it should provide better characteristics than rubber mounting.

Offline Hidden

  • Moderator
  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 96
  • "Help people enlighten to truth"
Re: Results from some tests...
« Reply #7 on: July 01, 2009, 08:29:36 am »
Donald, you might be right with that theory. We just have tried two extremes, one extremely stiff solution where nothing can vibrate. Then we tried a solution ith extrem,ely soft rubber like a gymnastics carpet and the results were amazing. Our extremely soft rubber is not very dampening, maybe it changes the amplitude but not the frequency, sorry for the misunderstanding.



we pushed 6 pcs of some vibrational dampening material like soft rubber between the cylinders(3 in the top and 3 in the bottom)

vibrational dampening material? would you rather suspect that an arrangement with minimum dampening characteristics would have better results?

With a tuning fork, it is fixed at one end, when you vibrate it and touch rubber it will dampen out quickly, when you touch metal it will continue to ring. (and when you dip it in water it splashes like crazy!) I suggest a metal structure to hold the tubes secure yet still able to vibrate. it should provide better characteristics than rubber mounting.
« Last Edit: July 01, 2009, 09:12:45 am by Gauss »

Online Hidden

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 2496
    • water structure and science
Re: Results from some tests...
« Reply #8 on: July 01, 2009, 09:43:45 am »
Hi gauss,

Very nice to read this result from you! Well done!
We love to see some on vid, if that is possible?
I know that Keely also worked with vibrations..........

What are the dimensions of your tubes?

Br
Steve
« Last Edit: July 01, 2009, 11:40:21 am by Steve »

Offline Hidden

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 396
Re: Results from some tests...
« Reply #9 on: July 01, 2009, 10:17:24 am »
Im continuing with this project I'm making , stephen meyers  dual synchronised 3 phase analog driver @ 24 volts .

Stephen said in his patent it works like a tuning fork shattering the water ;D
Stan said freq must be matched to the spacing, also makes one think of physical vibrations.
LF physical oscillations are acoustic vibrations, so it makes perfectly sense.