Author Topic: Impedance Matching  (Read 2435 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Hidden

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 78
Re: Impedance Matching
« Reply #70 on: May 05, 2009, 18:26:53 pm »
agh alright....now that i have realized the coil was connected magnetically against the bifilar this might be why there was no "pumping" action against a load......the magnetic field from the secondary was canceling out the bifilar's magnetic field.


also the coil itself hits audible harmoonics around 40-60khz depending on the load it is attached too....but there is a waveform bounce inside it.......this happened when it was connected incorrectly.

i have no time today to mess with the coil.....but tonight i should have plenty of free time.

this might work!!!!!

today could be the day

i find myself far too optimistic.

why kinesis ?? Are you saying what I think you are saying ? Are you imcompetent to this point ?

All coils  must be in clockwise . there is no rogue coil setup thats clockwise while others are not , or vice versa ...

+clockwise array of coils- cell

Offline Hidden

  • Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 657
Re: Impedance Matching
« Reply #71 on: May 05, 2009, 23:14:03 pm »
you don't even know the difference between counter and clock wise or it's effects on transformer efficiency so hush hush and run along.

first off john winds his coils all with the same orientation......so it is either all North oriented towards the cell or south oriented towards the cell.

in john's windings his outputs can be vice versa......but in this case the diode is the only thing that has to be moved and the input nad output have to be switched in order to switch magnetic orientation.

so dankie tell me the difference if NORTH oriented coil windings go into the cell rather then SOUTH oriented windings going into the cell...

let's see how competent you are.

you don't even know the laws of magnetics yet.....or let alone how you are going to wind your acclaimed chokes.

Offline Hidden

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 78
Re: Impedance Matching
« Reply #72 on: May 06, 2009, 01:18:34 am »
You optimistic ?

You have basicly been doing this like a bufoon , everything I said you ignored , every proposition you do otherwise ,  and accidents and still you defy me...

Just quit reporting your findings for a while will ya ... Its painful for me to watch this stuff .

Offline Hidden

  • Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 657
Re: Impedance Matching
« Reply #73 on: May 06, 2009, 02:04:23 am »
thank you for avoiding my question to prove your lack of education and understanding.


you have never even wound one transformer in your entire life.

nor do you have anything to show.


keep sitting on the side lines and trying to act like your apart of the team.

i enjoy every absurd comment you make.

 :)


Offline Hidden

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 1002
Re: Impedance Matching
« Reply #74 on: May 09, 2009, 17:06:12 pm »
From Stan's favorite dictionary.